Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry - VetAgro Sup Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue EFSA Journal Année : 2022

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry

Søren Saxmose Nielsen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paolo Calistri
  • Fonction : Auteur
Elisabetta Canali
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julian Ashley Drewe
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bruno Garin-Bastuji
  • Fonction : Auteur
José Luis Gonzales Rojas
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christian Gortázar
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mette Herskin
  • Fonction : Auteur
Virginie Michel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
  • Fonction : Auteur
Barbara Padalino
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paolo Pasquali
  • Fonction : Auteur
Helen Clare Roberts
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hans Spoolder
  • Fonction : Auteur
Karl Ståhl
  • Fonction : Auteur
Antonio Velarde
  • Fonction : Auteur
Arvo Viltrop
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christoph Winckler
  • Fonction : Auteur
Francesca Baldinelli
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alessandro Broglia
  • Fonction : Auteur
Lisa Kohnle
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julio Alvarez
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for poultry in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR E. faecalis can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Categories A, B and D; 0–5%, 5–10% and 1–10% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 3 and 5 (Categories C and E, 33–66% and 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for AMR E. faecalis according to Article 8 criteria are mostly birds of the orders Galliformes and Anseriformes, but also mammals and reptiles can serve as reservoirs.

Dates et versions

hal-04615317 , version 1 (18-06-2024)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Dominique J. Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, et al.. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry. EFSA Journal, 2022, 20 (2), ⟨10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7127⟩. ⟨hal-04615317⟩
36 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More